Dartmouth Professor Finds That Iconic Oswald Photo Was Not Faked

Dartmouth Computer Scientist Hany Farid has new evidence regarding a photograph of accused John F. Kennedy assassin Lee Harvey Oswald. Read more at Dartmouth News: http://tinyurl.com/y9k33yf

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Dartmouth Professor Finds That Iconic Oswald Photo Was Not Faked

  1. flowerpt says:

    Nice, but I was actually expecting some of the statistical analysis as in prior work – curious if this photo was also analyzed using that technique.

  2. mongolishous says:

    your mother

  3. pikmindoctor says:

    Seems pretty convincing to me. I’m sure the police and government do terrible things, but probably more out of individuals neglect and indifference than actual plotting.

  4. SeexiBiene91 says:

    jem mit mir chattn hab auch bilder so langweilig zur zeit

  5. insanic1 says:

    yeah do the fake holocaust photos

  6. trylonperisphere says:

    We have to build 3D models” or we could just go outside on a sunny day and see if the shadows roughly match any random person.

  7. burrdturgler says:

    you can’t see but”"about right”"maybe a little bit of the scene around him”"more or less”"my favorite part”"everything is perfect”"100% perfect”… “you’ve got to bring more rational reasoning to these types of things …”

  8. Byfbowhiffen says:

    Your not going to be 100% accurate…The nose just needed to be generally the correct size. The shadows are also not as perfect as he had said but it accurately depicts what was shown in the photograph.You also don’t have to model an entire scene in order to get these sorts of results, just the most influential parts like lighting bouncing off a house or reflective object. What would be the point in modeling every twig and rock if they aren’t going to yield any sort of significant result.

  9. SharkBite55 says:

    JFK…Blown Away…By the CIA…Coup d’tat in the USA…Burn in hell Hoover Edgar J.High Treason in America.

  10. aalhazzred says:

    Non sequitur – That shows the shadows are correct, nothing more. Does the Professor content it would be IMPOSSIBLE to do this in the 60s? Hardly, in fact, if you were going to fake a picture you would look for a picture of his head to match up the shadows at the same time of day. Words like exactly and perfectly and “impossible” betray a lack of objectivity there are enough variables here to drive a truck throughCase still not closed. Keep trying though.

Leave a Reply